How can businesses finance commercial solar panels?
- Jamie Brimblecombe

- Jan 28
- 2 min read
There are two traditional funding routes available to pay for a commercial solar panel installation for your business. These are self-funding or a power purchase agreement. These options are explained in more detail below.
Self-fund (CapEx)
Under this model, the business uses its own capital expenditure budget to pay for the solar panel installation. They will own the solar panels from day one and be required to operate and maintain the solar panels.
Pros | Cons | ||
![]() | Full ownership of the system | ![]() | High upfront capital cost |
![]() | Maximum long-term financial return | ![]() | Opportunity cost of capital |
![]() | All energy savings and export income go directly to you | ![]() | Cash used for solar can’t be used elsewhere |
![]() | Protection against energy price volatility | ![]() | Exposure to performance risk |
![]() | You can leverage the asset against traditional finance | ![]() | Increased payback time due to interest |
![]() | Lower lifetime cost vs PPA | ![]() | You are responsible for maintenance, monitoring, inverter replacement, and insurance |
When self-funding usually makes sense
You have strong cash reserves
You want maximum ROI
You are happy with ongoing maintenance obligations
Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)
Under this model, a third-party investor funds, owns, installs and maintains the solar installation on the businesses roof or land. Power generated from the solar panels is sold to the business for a pre-agreed rate and timeframe. Typically terms of 15-25 years, enabling savings vs grid electricity rate of up to 60%.
Pros | Cons | ||
![]() | The PPA provider funds, installs, and owns the system meaning zero upfront capital cost | ![]() | No ownership |
![]() | Immediate energy cost savings | ![]() | Lower total lifetime savings |
![]() | Predictable energy pricing | ![]() | Long contract terms |
![]() | Fixed or indexed pricing helps budget certainty | ![]() | PPAs can reduce flexibility if your site or energy needs change |
![]() | No maintenance or performance risk | ![]() | Less control over the system |
![]() | Treated as an operating expense rather than a capital asset, therefore not on balance sheet | ![]() | PPAs involve detailed legal and commercial agreements |
When a PPA usually makes sense
You want no upfront spend
Cash is better used for core business growth
You value certainty and low risk
Summary:
Self-fund – higher risk with ongoing maintenance obligations but higher lifetime savings
PPA – lower risk with no ongoing maintenance obligations but lower lifetime savings
If you would like Eden to help with deciding which option best suits your business, please get in contact.





